The Exposure Triangle

Posted on February 22, 2012 by Scott

This was partly taken from my most recent book titled: “The Handbook of Photographing Arizona,” but I just made a Youtube video to supplement the information. I want to do a lot more learning and tutorial based videos in the future.

The video on Youtube:

The exposure triangle: All current cameras can manage exposure pretty well, so it isn’t bad to let your camera manage the details while you focus on proper composition. However, taking full control isn’t that difficult with enough knowledge.

Images speak louder than words, therefore the graphic above should be very helpful in explaining the relationship of three key camera settings: ISO value, shutter speed, and aperture size. Each camera setting is also responsible for different properties you can expect to see in resulting photos. For example, a high ISO value will have more image noise, a slow shutter speed will cause more motion blur, and a large aperture value will give you thinner depth of field. The inverse of that is as you would expect. A low ISO will have less noise, a fast shutter speed will freeze action, and a small aperture will increase the depth of what looks like it is sharply in focus. Your camera will usually do a good job of managing these three settings, but don’t be scared in trying to control one or more for yourself.

Posted in Learning Series, Video | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments

Linux Photoshop, Lightroom, and Apple Aperture alternatives (Bibble aka. AfterShot)

Posted on February 20, 2012 by Scott

I’ve used Linux on and off for many years. Although, the last few years my primary desktop computer is Linux only (On Kubuntu at the moment). The big issue with Linux is that many large commercial applications (and games) don’t offer a native build for Linux or even acknowledge that it exists. I spend a good deal of time producing content such as photos or videos. This is a problem.

I’ve settled with Kdenlive for video editing. It’s good enough for what I do at the moment and my experience with commercial NLE was not that extensive, so I don’t know what I’m missing (I own a copy of premiere 5.1 and Sony Vegas Platinum). The biggest issue is Photoshop, because I can’t find anything to replace it. What I do now is open up batches of RAW files in Adobe Camera Raw, tweak them by hand and save the changes, and then run a batch process in Photoshop itself. The whole process works alright. I would use Bridge for the editing step, but that doesn’t work well at all in WINE (Windows emulation). Photoshop is also a bit slow and some aspects like the “File Info…” window doesn’t even function at all.

I noticed some users on PentaxForums.com mention a piece of software called Bibble (now known as Corel AfterShot). It sounded good except for one flaw some of the users mentioned.

The Pentax k5 Corel AfterShot (Bibble) Highlight Issue…

As you can see, those red highlights are a bit problem. I tried some minimal tweaking, but that didn’t seem to help remove the odd coloration.

The frustrating thing is that the program seems very functional and fast. Besides the other issue of it being unable to load Adobe created DNGs (I converted many of my old Fuji RAWs and *ist DS RAWs to DNG), I think it would be worth picking up.

Posted in Linux | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments

The Handbook of Photographing Arizona in print.

Posted on February 18, 2012 by Scott

I completed my second large book titled “The Handbook of Photographing Arizona” that should be a bit more generally appealing than my first.

Here is a video I made for the book:

Book description (color print version):
If you are planning a trip to the Southwest, interested in learning more about taking photos in Arizona, or even just photography in general, this book is for you! I go over the technical basics of photography and how they relate to the conditions and situations you might face in Arizona, all from a Midwesterner’s perspective and packaged in a nice portable 5.5″ x 8.5″ handbook. This book gives visual enjoyment with over 35 photos as well as important knowledge on photographic tools and information about various places in Arizona.

All of the places it is available:
Full Color Print (Amazon.com, Createspace Store)

B&W Interior Value Print (Amazon.com, Createspace Store)

Amazon Kindle E-book

B&N Nook PubIt! E-book

Apple iTunes Store

Lulu Book Market E-book

Posted in Books | Tagged , | Comments

Q&A: Help me find a quality normal prime lens?

Posted on February 18, 2012 by Scott

Already another question and answer post! Keep them coming. :) Sharing information is a great way for everyone to learn. Edit: I have to say, I like the way he thinks. Why waste money on an inferior lens if you will eventually replace it? Opting to start with that 50-135mm f2.8 lens was a good idea. I’d say, If you have the cash, it is often a good idea to truly consider the high quality equipment for your given system of choice. On the other hand, the most expensive lens isn’t always the best. In my response, I go over some issues I see with the 31mm lens, but it is still one of the best lenses out there.

The initial contact:

I bumped into you on Youtube, have been following your channel for a while now. Great stuff!

I’m in dire need for some advice, and I have a hunch I came to the right place. I recently got into photography and bought a k-5 and a DA 50-135mm. That’s my only lens (I spent my last buck on it:P, and I’m loving it) so now I am looking for something wider. I really badly need a normal prime (something around 35mm).

Since I have little experience both with lenses and photography in general I tend to follow a simple rule: the more expensive the better. So I keep returning to the FA 31mm 1.8. I know it sound snobbish for a hobbyist to go for such a classy lens, but I wouldn’t mind the expense if deep down I knew it is worth it and simply if I enjoyed it to the last of the 1000$. Truth be told I am looking for a normal prime that would be my main lens that I can grow to love and wouldn’t get it off my camera – in which case it really can’t be too expensive. On the other hand, if I’m paying for the metal casing and sexy look it’s a huge waste. Are there other lenses that I can get away with cheaper? I don’t mind it being manual focus, I just want it to be above average in IQ and fast (at least f2, but probably even faster). What about the FA 35mm f2 AL? Or if you know of any respected old lenses that I can buy used. Are there current Carl Zeiss lenses for K mount?
What about the new crop sensor ones?

I plan to do some industrial photography so I need it to be decently sharp.

It is clear that the price for each lens is justified to a certain extent. The problem is I don’t EXACTLY know what I would be getting/loosing for the extra $. I want a lens that I won’t be needing to upgrade in a year or two, because in that case 150$ would be more expensive that a 1000$. I guess, simply put, I need a “lovable lens”.

Thanks.

P.s. If the price is right, I don’t mind not having AF.

My response:

I probably can give you more to think about at least.

The Zeiss lens are very expensive. There is a Zeiss 28mm f2 lens, but it’s a good $250 more expensive than the 31mm Pentax lens. I have not used Zeiss lenses, so I can’t comment on them. They are well regarded though.
The Sigma 30mm f1.4 probably would not be a good option because reviews say the corners are not very sharp throughout most of the aperture range.

I like my 31mm lens, but it isn’t perfect. For some reason, my 31mm lens is currently front focusing on my K-5 (I recently did a small photoshoot and noticed it, switched to live-view for focusing and it was perfect). So lately I have been using it in live-view mode as I have not spent the time to try and adjust the focus correction function in the camera. The 31mm is my go-to lens for videos. It’s wide enough for most situations, but not too wide, and of course the resulting quality is good. Another few negative things are the lens hood is integrated into the lens itself (designed for full-frame) and it doesn’t have quick-shift functionality (the 31mm was made before they released that feature).

I wrote an article comparing the kit lens at around 31mm to the FA 31mm:
http://photographybanzai.com/2011/09/19/comparison-pentax-fa-31mm-f1-8-limited-vs-pentax-da-18-55mm-f3-5-5-6-31mm/

I also have a review I wrote up on the 31mm as well:
http://photographybanzai.com/2011/09/29/lens-review-pentax-fa-31mm-f1-8-limited/

It certainly is a good lens, but like anything it isn’t perfect and I do see some things I’d like Pentax to change with a revision.

There is the Pentax FA35mm f2 lens. There are some used ones right now on keh.com for around $430. The DA 35mm f2.4 is said to be a child of this design. I think either one is a good option, but I personally don’t know if they are as sharp and contrasty as the 31mm lens because I’ve never used them.

Then we have the FA* 24mm f2 lens. Some people think it is great, others not so much. You could probably find a used one around $250 less than the 31mm lens. I really want this lens, but lacking in the fund department at the moment.

This recent thread on Pentax Forums about 24mm lenses might be helpful:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/173864-24mm-lens.html

Posted in Question & Answer | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments