Skip to main content

Lens Review: Sigma 24-60mm F2.8 EX DG

This Sigma lens came out around 2004 as a reasonably priced higher-end zoom lens specifically designed for digital SLR cameras. It has a maximum aperture of f2.8 throughout the entire zoom range, which is its claim to fame to being considered a higher-end lens. The reason it was lower priced probably had something to do with the unusual zoom range, 24mm being 6mm short of most standard kit zoom lens ranges (18-55mm). 

The barrel material is standard EX fair, which is either a love or hate thing for users. I personally am not too fond of Sigma’s textured paint on plastic that they use. I bought this lens many years ago and just recently traded it in to help pay for a new camera body. My justification was that I rarely use it as I prefer prime lenses in the focal lengths it covers. 

Technical specifications for the lens:

  • Lens Mount: K-mount
  • Lens Construction: 15 groups, 16 elements
  • Angle of View: 84.1 – 39.6 degrees
  • Aperture: f2.8 constant
  • Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
  • Minimum Aperture: f22
  • Minimum Focusing Distance: 38 cm /14.9 in
  • Filter Diameter: 77mm
  • Maximum Magnification: 1:5.8
  • Dimensions:
  • 83.6 mm x 84.5 mm
  • 3.29 in x 3.32 in
  • 110 mm / 4.3 in extended barrel
  • Weight: 555 grams (19.5 oz)
  • Case: cube case
  • Objective Cap: 77mm clip on
  • Hood: 77mm plastic flower pedal type
  • Lens Aperture Ring: none
  • Tripod Adapter: none
  • Diaphragm Control: in camera only
  • Focal Length: 24-60mm
  • Notes: DG should provide more frame filling ability than DC lenses from Sigma. Screw-drive auto-focus is being used.

General talk about the lens and its features:
The primary draw for this lens is that it has a reasonably large aperture that is constant throughout the 24-60mm zoom range. That means whatever focal length you are at, you will have f2.8 available to gather more light and/or have smaller depth of field. As stated before, the range of 24-60mm is a bit odd in that the standard is to generally have wider angle in a short zoom lens like this. People generally buy lenses like this to replace their low-end kit lens, but this lens deviates from that goal. It’s still manageable, but not ideal in wide angle ability. The lens would either be considered large or small depending on what you are use to. 

A Pentax 18-55mm kit lens is considerably smaller, yet this lens isn’t massive considering its wide aperture. Built quality wise, the exterior is plastic that is painted with a special textured matte black paint. The positive of this paint is that it is very good at not reflecting light and also provides decent grip. The negative is that it is difficult to clean and can flake off easier than other types of paint. Longevity is questionable depending on how tough you are on your lenses, but the surface paint isn’t vital to functionality meaning it is just up to personal preference. 

This lens was not designed to be used for manual focus, so the focus-throw is short and the focus ring is cheap feeling when being rotated. The focus ring does not have anything like Pentax’s quick-shift mechanism, so to use manual focus you must change the camera body’s setting to disengage the screw-drive focus. The zoom ring fares better as it is large and pretty smooth when rotating. The notched rubber on the manual focus and zoom rings is harder and slicker in feel than the barrel material, which is a bit of an odd choice. One nice little feature of this lens is that it includes a lock that prevents the lens barrel from accidentally extending when not in use. Lastly, the lens comes with a very nice case and decent lens hood to help prevent flare. 

The lens is soft at f2.8, but sharp at MTF (around f5.6) at 24mm wide angle. The lens doesn’t fare as well at 60mm, but the same to a lesser degree. It also suffers from aberrations at 24mm, but they are pretty much non-existent at 60mm. While I didn’t do any tests half way through the zoom range, I would expect performance to be between the two extremes if not a little toward being the optimal focal length range to get the best results.

What I like about the lens:
– Nice wide aperture lens allows it to be effective in many situations.
– Sharp when set to the optimal aperture size and toward the wide angle (MTF, around f5.6).
– While I’m a bit critical of Sigma’s EX build quality (no idea what their newer lenses are like…), It is nice for the most part. I remember being impressed back when my experience mostly consisted of kit lenses. It is solid and should last a long time compared to the basic plastic stuff.
– Provides the convenience of a standard zoom lens.

What I’m not too fond of:
– The lens isn’t very strong at f2.8 compared to smaller apertures.
– It is pretty big and heavy for a standard lens if you are use to kit lenses.
– Not very wide angle.
– Build quality isn’t even close to the metal Pentax lenses.

Images with a bit of analysis:


The lens has strong center sharpness around f5.6



Color fringing aberrations are very evident at 24mm

A few additional images:






Conclusion:
This lens is not available new anymore, but can still be bought used occasionally. Depending on the price, I’d say it’s a strong performer as long as you try to stay within the sweet spot aperture and toward the middle of the zoom. Outside of that range, it’s serviceable and will most likely still provide higher quality results than most kit lenses. The constant aperture is its biggest selling point, but overall build quality and optics help complete the package. Not much else to say, but if the price is right and you want something better than standard cheap throw-away kit lenses, this might be the ticket.

Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. Key Specifications:

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open Br

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm