Skip to main content

Lens Review: Zenitar 16mm F2.8 Fisheye



The Zenitar was one of the first lenses I bought after getting a Pentax *ist DS kit in late 2005. While I’m not sure exactly why I opted for the Zenitar over something more practical, I ended up buying one new from an Ebay seller as it was cheap, said to be sharp, and interesting due to the fisheye feature. 

Technical specifications for the lens:

  • Lens Mount: K-mount
  • Lens Construction: 10 elements in 7 groups
  • Angle of View: 180 degrees (83 degrees in APS-C)
  • Aperture: F2.8
  • Number of Diaphragm Blades: 6
  • Minimum Aperture: F22
  • Minimum Focusing Distance: 1 ft (0.3048 meters)
  • Filter Diameter: 26.5mm threaded rear mount type
  • Maximum Magnification: 0.13x
  • Dimensions: 63mm x 49mm
  • Weight: 0.31 kg
  • Case: soft Velcro closure type
  • Objective Cap: Push on
  • Hood: built-in (full frame)
  • Lens Aperture Ring: yes
  • Tripod Adapter: No
  • Diaphragm Control: manual
  • Focal Length: 16mm (equiv. 24.3mm)
  • Notes: fisheye type lens 

General talk about the lens and its features:
The Zenitar 16mm f2.8 Fisheye lens is a product from Russia that’s available through non-standard channels like Ebay and a few lesser known online stores (aka. use caution and research before buying). It’s a moderate wide angle lens when considering the APS-C crop factor, but still provides some fisheye distortion effect to the resulting images. 

The lens is fully manual and does not transmit any information to the camera body. Aperture is controlled by a small ring that goes in what feels to be half-clicks through the full range. The lens is primarily constructed of metal, which gives a good feel to the lens. The rubberized focus ring has a nice smooth feel when rotating. 

Focusing the lens isn’t particularly difficult thanks to it being a wide angle. On the back-end of the lens there is a thread to attach one of the 4 lens filters (3 colored and one clear). The front element is large and appears to be multi-coated to resist flare. There is a small built-in hood, but it is designed to block stray light with full frame cameras in mind.

What I like about the lens:

  • The lens is nicely constructed, especially for the price I paid years ago. Now, it looks like the lens goes around $220, which is still a pretty good bargain.
  • As I mentioned before, the manual focus ring is smooth and effective.
  • Rendering can be pleasing to the eye with vibrant colors. This isn’t always the case though.
  • The colored filters are a fun little addition to the lens.

What I’m not too fond of:

  • Prone to flare and visual artifacts in bright light. Although it’s easy to clone out any small artifacts, so I don’t consider that a big issue.
  • Completely manual focus and aperture with no data connection to the camera body, so EXIF data saved is limited.
  • Easy to get a finger into the frame on accident, especially with gloves on.
  • Lens cap is cheap and broke on me.
  • The aperture ring action is a bit cheap feeling as well as loud.


Images with a bit of analysis:

Red filter attached.


It’s easy to get your fingers in the frame by accident (lower left black spot is my glove)

Flare is pretty extreme at times:


It’s fun to experiment with the lens:



This lens is versatile and can produce good results:


A few additional images:





Conclusion:
For the price, it’s a good option to experiment with fisheye and moderate wide angle photography. There are other options available to be bought new, but all cost more than the Zenitar. The Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye, which is around $300 more than the Zenitar. 

There are also quite a few lenses available from Sigma (10mm f2.8 and 15mm f2.8) as well as a few off-brand options like the Bower 8mm f3.5 Fisheye. While the image quality isn’t top-notch, it’s serviceable and at times quite good. 

Flare and artifacts can be an issue with the lens, but some of it is easily correctable in post-processing. You need to keep more in mind when using the lens as it is completely manual in operation. Given the price, it’s a decent purchase in my opinion.


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...