Skip to main content

Lens Review: Pentax DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL

This lens was available from 2004 until around 2008 as the primary kit lens for Pentax DSLRs. Currently you can find it around at used camera lens sites like KEH or auction sites like eBay. It’s easy to find and very cheap. This is actually my second AL lens as I sold my first and acquired this one when I bought a used *ist D camera body recently. 


The 18-55mm AL fits the standard kit lens properties well, with a few positive exceptions as I’ll go over later. I’ve never been too impressed with kit lenses in general and was not fond of my first 18-55mm AL. Let’s see how this one is…


Technical specifications for the lens:

  • Lens Mount: PENTAX KAF2
  • Lens Construction: 12 elements in 9 groups (1 aspherical element)
  • Angle of View: 76-29 degrees
  • Aperture: F3.5-5.6
  • Number of Diaphragm Blades: 6
  • Minimum Aperture: F22-40
  • Minimum Focusing Distance: 9.84 inches (0.25m)
  • Filter Diameter: 52mm
  • Maximum Magnification: 0.34X
  • Dimensions: 2.7 x 2.7″ (68.0 x 67.5mm)
  • Weight: 7.8 oz. (220g)
  • Case: S80-120
  • Objective Cap: O-LC52
  • Hood: PH-RBA 52mm
  • Lens Aperture Ring: N/A
  • Tripod Adapter: No
  • Diaphragm Control: Fully Automatic
  • Focal Length: 18-55mm (equiv. 27.5-82.5mm)
  • Notes: Quick-shift focus, Filter window, SP (Super Protect) coating

General talk about the lens:
Everything about this lens is ordinary. The zoom range of 18-55mm is the industry standard and the maximum aperture of f3.5-5.6 is also what most manufacturers offer with their standard kit. With ever decreasing margins on DSLRs, some companies are now offering their kit lens with lower build quality like using a plastic lens mount or using low quality plastics in the casing. This isn’t the case with the Pentax 18-55mm AL.

The 18-55 AL is probably one of the best kit lenses in regard to build quality. It has a metal lens mount as well as quality feeling plastic and rubber throughout. The focus and zoom rings on this used lens I have are still pretty smooth, so it appears to have good longevity.

The lens has features such as quick-shift and a protective coating (SP, Super Protect) to the front lens element. Quick-shift allows the user to change focus by hand after the camera has finished auto-focusing. I’ve found that feature useful when I want to make the camera as small as possible before putting it in a bag. Without quick-shift I would need to switch the camera to manual focus before shifting the focus ring. Super Protect is a fluoride coating that is designed to make cleaning of the lens very easy. There have even been tests where permanent marker has been shown to be easily removed. 

It also was sold with a nice petal-style lens hood (including a removable filter door). This used lens that I acquired didn’t come with a hood sadly, so I can’t show you photos of it.

Video Overview:

What I like about the lens:

  • It’s cheap and easy to find.
  • Overall performance is pretty good for a kit lens. Especially at around 28-35mm in focal length.
  • Good build quality for a kit lens.
  • The zoom range is convenient.
  • A nice lens cap and hood.
  • It’s easy to come by and cheap, so you are more prone to take worthwhile risks you wouldn’t usually with more expensive lenses.
  • A super small aperture, up to f40 depending on the focal length, is available.
  • Focusing speed is fast and reliable as it uses the screw-drive mechanism for auto-focus.
  • Quick-shift and Super Protect lens coating.
  • The front barrel does not rotate when focusing, so filters like a circular polarizer work well.

What I’m not fond of:

  • It covers focal lengths I prefer to use prime lenses at.
  • I’m use to fast prime lenses, so this lens can feel a bit debilitating at times. This is less of an issue with a camera that has strong high ISO abilities like the Pentax K-5.
  • This is said to be lesser in optical quality compared to the AL II version of this lens.
  • 52mm filters are a bit odd compared to most of my other lenses that have 49mm, 58mm, 67mm, and 77mm.
  • Hexagonal blur highlights for most of the aperture range due to the 6 straight blades.
  • No aperture ring, but this is a “feature” of newer lenses in general.
  • The focus ring rotates when the camera is auto-focusing.
  • Prone to flare at wide angle (I don’t have a lens hood, so I’m not sure if that would help). Some purple fringing at wide angle in extreme light.
  • Vignetting is an issue for a large part of the wide end of the lens.

Image talk and analysis:

This lens can produce high detail when using the right settings. (28mm, f5.6, 1/400th, macro range)


Color fringing isn’t too bad.

When not using optimal settings, sharpness is average. (55mm, f7.1, 1/500th, macro range)


Vignetting can be very visible with this lens.


Post-processed samples:







Conclusion:
Often, you get what you pay for with lenses. The 18-55mm AL is an exception to the rule for a few reasons. It’s readily available at a cheap cost. Also because in-production AL II and WR AL are available, meaning the original AL gets discarded more often than it would otherwise. While I have not used the lens much since I got it in a packaged deal, I’ll admit that it can serve a purpose and is worth keeping around or buying if don’t already have one. 

The main reason would be for a decent backup in case of emergency. I’d even consider keeping a second one in the car. Considering the price, it’s a lens you can get dirty without much care, which can lead to some fun experimental photography. It really fits well with nice outside daytime lighting. Sure, it’s isn’t a FA 31mm f1.8, but it can get the job done.

Popular posts from this blog

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...

Canon M6 Mark II HDMI & 10-bit Output?

I’m writing all of this down as in case sources disappear and I want to reference M6ii HDMI-out information in the future.  So this is not by any means a definitive source but rather a jumble of information I’m putting together in the moment. The “HDMI info disp” setting to select clean output mode. There is one webpage I know about that mentioned the Canon EOS M6 Mark II supports clean HDMI output in 10-bit 4:2:2. I don’t think the page exists any longer on Canon USA’s website because the old link no longer works after a redesign. https://youtu.be/_UT9u0XVn5U However it does currently exist on the Internet Archive . Here’s the important quote from that webpage:  HDMI recording: Menu-selected user choices for HDMI output with info (images recorded to the SD card); Clean 4K output, or Clean Full HD output. With clean output, compatible HDMI recorders can be connected with appropriate HDMI cords. During Clean HDMI out, video is not recorded to an in-camera SD card. With compatib...