Skip to main content

The first compelling mirrorless camera...Sony NEX-7

Time for another opinion article. This time I’m looking at the viability of mirrorless cameras. In particular, one of the most interesting out there at the moment. This is an opinion article because I haven’t used the camera. I’m basing my words from reviews I’ve seen as well as the general specifications.

All camera images are stock photos from Sony’s press department. 


The Sony NEX-7 isn’t your normal mirrorless camera.

It has a professional look to it, reminiscent of the Pentax K-7/K-5 series of cameras I currently use. It even uses magnesium alloy for the casing like they have. I like the look and the size (8% narrower, 31% shorter, 41% thinner).

The camera looks to have a nice control layout. You can have aperture, shutter speed, and ISO all accessible with semi-dedicated controls. This sounds like a key feature and should make photographing with the camera a breeze. I would have liked more dedicated buttons in general though. I’ll give them a +1 for the dedicated video button.

Positives:

  • A system that uses APS-C sized sensors. This is bigger than the majority of mirrorless cameras out at the moment. Ideal for depth of field control.
  • A MIC port! I use mine a lot because I record videos for this site and it’s a great help. This has become one of my must haves in a camera I plan on using for video.
  • Compact compared to DSLR cameras, but substantial enough that it looks easy to hold and use. This probably has the most ideal size for a semi-pro mirrorless camera give or take.
  • The EVF is said to be top-notch (I haven’t tried it yet). EVF are about trade-offs, but they do have benefits of their own like seeing more data in the viewfinder than you would with an optical one as well as being able to use the viewfinder to record video.
  • These cameras seem great for video and as I do more and more, any improvements in that area is a big positive. 1080p 60fps video recording ability. Impressive…

Problems I see:

  • 1/4000th sec. shutter speed. SLRs at this price range have 1/8000th. 1/4000th maximum could be a problem outside with fast glass like that 24mm f1.8.
  • No weather resistance. If they are going to charge around $1200, it should be. Although maybe I’m spoiled by Pentax in this regard.
  • As of the time of this article, it isn’t available along with the 24mm and 50mm lenses.
  • Estimated shots per charge at 350 (EVF) and 450 (LCD) is a negative compared to SLRs. How the LCD is more efficient I don’t know…
  • Sony uses a nonstandard hot-shoe apparatus, so with things like generic dumb flash triggers, you need an adapter.
  • The camera appears to not have a wired cable release. An odd vacancy considering the level of camera this is.

Overall, it seems pretty compelling for a mirrorless camera. It certainly isn’t cheap, but has most of the features I would expect at that price.

I checked out a popular online store to see what a kit would cost. My ideal kit is comprised of two camera bodies and a number of prime lenses. I also added in a zoom lens for extra range when I need it.



Kit details with prices:

  • 2x NEX-7 camera bodies: $2399.98
  • 2x additional batteries: $105.90
  • 24mm f1.8 lens: $999.95
  • 50mm f1.8 lens: $299.95
  • 16mm f2.8 lens: $249.99
  • 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 lens: 349.99

I could see dual wielding the two camera bodies fitted with the 24mm and 50mm lenses. That would be a pretty ideal setup and small to boot!

The total with shipping was $4415.79. That’s hardly a good deal, but it is a pretty decent setup when price isn’t considered. 16mm, 24mm, and 50mm is a good prime lens range with respectable aperture sizes, and the 55-210mm is sufficient for events where telephoto is needed. Also keep in mind that prices should go down once everything is in stock and has been out for a few months. 

The size differences compared to my current kit would be very appealing at conventions, but on the other hand, not having a maximum shutter speed of 1/8000th of a second could be a problem outside with f1.8. I’ll have to look into that. I do know when I tried using my old *ist D outside with the 85mm f1.4 I had problems. 


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...