Skip to main content

The desire for practical photography.

When thinking practical photography, the first thing that comes to mind is convenience. The less that gets in your way, the better you can accomplish what you have in mind with as little hassle as possible.

While using convenient equipment is important, using what you have to do the job is important too.

  • Use the equipment you have on hand. Don’t waste time looking for the perfect piece of camera equipment, because it probably won’t truly make that much of a difference.
  • Use and bring as little stuff as possible. Sometimes I’ve not brought something and later though it might have been useful, but it isn’t the end of the world (take note: I’m not talking about professional photography where you should duplicate and cover all possibilities). Seeing as I use prime lenses most of the time, I’m use to managing with what is available. It’s actually much more fluid and experience when I don’t put much thought into gear while out in the field.
  • Avoid extras if you can given your goals for the session.
  • If you don’t need a flash, don’t bring it with you.
  • If you can get away with holding your flash in one hand and using a wireless trigger, do that rather than bringing a light-stand.

The type of equipment has become more and more important to me. While one side wants something like a full-frame optical DSLR camera, the more logical side has an interest in mirrorless systems. Some of the mirrorless systems are getting close feature wise, but still lack things like a 1/8000th shutter speed. I think eventually a APS-C or full-frame mirrorless camera will be a good direction to transition, or more likely supplement with if the funds are available. I’ve sometimes felt even my K-5 and K-7 feel too bulky for many things I do. The main issue is thickness of the camera.

I’ll admit, my style is at odds with my desire for convenience. Using prime lenses and flash increase the bulk two-fold as I often use two camera bodies and two prime lenses at the same time. I’m not really sure how to deal with that other than going back to using a normal lens exclusively as I have done in the past.

Lately I’ve been spending most of my time making videos for Youtube. While my cameras are not ideal for video, they are sufficient for what I’ve been doing so far.

I’ve been thinking of ways to practice Japanese and started reviewing American foods, but trying to use Japanese instead of English.

EDIT, here's a screenshot of the videos I had made back then. Some of them eventually got decent viewership, but the time consuming nature of using Japanese and other reasons I eventually left that idea. At the moment I post short food and drink reviews to the channel primarily meant for Amazon's Creator Hub (I earn commissions on there) where my page on there resides.



Most of the videos have been split-screen. What I do is use the K-5 with a 31mm lens and the K-7 and 100mm macro lens. The K-5 has an external microphone attached.




So the K-5 gives a general view, and the K-7 gives a close-up of the product I’m talking about. It works pretty well.






Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. Key Specifications:

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open Br

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm