Skip to main content

My YouTube Performance in 2019

I was able to make 2019 the best year ever for my related YouTube channel. In this article I’m going to reflect on the statistics and compare it to my previous performance. This level of effort came with sacrifices. Hopefully, in time, I’ll be able to make the online media and video thing… my thing. I still don’t feel like I’m that close. Anyways, on to the statistics! 

Some of the primary statistics for 2019.

For calculations, I’ll be going by the internal totals for the channel rather than the public stats. There is a difference between the two of over 100,000 views due to videos I’ve deleted over the years. On the admin end, those videos count toward totals. Also, sorry if some of the calculations are off! I’m not a math wizard and won’t likely be proofreading this too much. It’s all just for fun and to get a general feel for how I did in 2019.

For some of the initial comparisons, I’ll be including the 2019 data. Though, for the rest I’ll be using the time span 1/29/2011-12/31/2018, so that I can get a better look at improvements made in 2019.

The channel was started on January 29th in 2011. So from then until the end of 2019, that’s 8 years and 339 days. I released 104 public videos in 2019. That’s around 3.5 days per video, or 2 videos per week.

From the start of the channel to before 2019 there were 361 public videos, so I produced around 22% of my channel’s total content in 2019. The channel’s total days from start to the end of 2019 is 3259. That means in 11% of the channel’s existence I made 22% of the total content.

910.9k total video views for 2019. From the start of the channel until the end of 2019, there have been 2.934M views. That means 31% of the views on the channel happened in 2019. A pretty significant percentage!

Subscriber count is also a number that increased a large percentage in 2019. At the end of 2019 there were 4.9k subscribers. In 2019, 2.1k people joined me, so 42.8% of that final total for the year happened in 2019.

According to the Creator Insider channel, watch time is a very important statistic. In 2019, all of the video views translated into 40.6k hours of watch time. Thinking about the scale of that, we all experience 8760 hours of life per year. That means between 4 and 5 humans would have to be watching one of my videos non-stop for an entire year to reach that amount of watch time in total for 2019. 

New features in the new Youtube Studio (formerly known as YTS Beta)

Impressions are basically any instance where the YouTube system places a video within access to a potential viewer. There are probably a lot of factors involved in whether the potential viewer even notices the thumbnail and title, but basically it’s one case of a potential video view. It’s one chance. I had 7.3 million chances in 2019.

Click-through is an instance where a potential viewer turned into a viewer of a video. I’ve heard statistics of 1% to 10% as being average. Creator insider has also said that the value can go down based on how strongly the system suggests a video. That happens because the “net” is widened into larger, less related, matches of content to potential viewers. You can see that impressions and click-through are up, but those increases probably related to how much data is kept on those statistics. They are new to the system, so I’m not sure how long that data has been around or what the increases mean off-hand. 

Average view duration is apparently important.

One of my difficulties is in view duration. That’s a combination of the average as shown above as well as percent watched for each video view. The goal is to have more of both. There is a real art to keeping viewers engaged. Just focusing on the channel average view duration in 2019 compared to the value of 1/29/2011-12/31/2018, it’s 2:40 versus 2:20. So for 2019 I gained 20 seconds on average to my views. Better than nothing!

View duration is a “me problem”. One I’m not exactly sure on how to work on. It’s probably a huge combination of factors from my personality to what I decide is in each video and how I edit my videos. The total length of each video can factor into this specific statistic. I’ve noticed and have seen people mention that having longer videos does help AVD. The people that care will stick with a longer video to help that average increase naturally. I’m not sure how to tackle longer content. Anyways, that’s my problem. 

A lot of interesting stats here!

I have a few YouTube channels. This one is, by far, the most successful. I basically stopped uploading to the others after the YouTube Partner Program requirements changed. However, I can see that topic plays into gender. My other channel that’s focused on cosplay, crafting, and sewing has a flip-flopped gender ratio. So it’s not that women are fewer in number on the platform, but rather they find my crafting videos more interesting to them than the stuff I make on SWPB.

However, I’ve very happy that my percentage of female viewers has increased. For the period before 2019 I had an average of 10.9% female viewers, so an increase of around 4% is good!

My viewership in the USA has actually decreased from a total percentage aspect. Before 2019, I had a USA average of 26.2% instead of 22.2%. The same for the UK with a change from 8.3% to 6.1%. In contrast, India has increased from 3.8% to 8.9%. I hear it’s a growing market and the population there is huge. The drawback is that AD rates in India are much less than places such as the USA, Canada, or UK. Indonesia is another place that increased with 3.6% in 2019 compared to 1.6% of previous years combined.

I’ve been very passionate about adding clean understandable captions to my videos. There are probably hundreds of videos on the channel now with captions I’ve fixed up. Most of the time I use YouTube’s auto-captions as a starting point, but there have been a few cases where I had to transcribe them (not easy on the hands…). Anyways, I see a lot of benefits to captions/subtitles and will continue to get them in my new videos and I hope to go back to the majority of older content too.

I don’t know if captions are factoring into the expansion of my audience location, but maybe it does help. I could see a foreign audience prefer videos with English subtitles over ones with only auto-captions or none at all. There is also a newer feature in the mobile app where it auto-plays videos muted with captions on. For those cases I’d have a better chance at gaining a viewer than if I only had auto generated captions.

In 2019, you can see that 11.2% of views had captions enabled. That feels like a sizable percent of total views in 2019. From the start of the channel to the end of 2018, only 2.2% had them enabled. I’m sure the amount of videos with captions mattered a lot here, but it’s nice to see an increase.

As for the age of the audience, it’s somewhat similar, but more distributed in 2019 compared to previous years. My actual age fits into 35-44 bracket (yeah, I’m getting up there…), which increased a bit with 19.9% in 2019 compared to 14.6% in all years previous.

That’s it! A lot on interesting data. I can safely say that 2019 was the best year I’ve managed to achieve on YouTube, though it was also a year I put in a huge amount of time and effort. I’m not sure where the turning point will be where I can call this my “job”, or have to significantly cut back on how much time I put into it. We will see… 


Popular posts from this blog

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, I’d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, I’ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but I’ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. 🤣 I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldn’t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. That’s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the video… His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand that’s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: I’ve seen confirm...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16–50mm F/3.5–5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...