Skip to main content

EF-M Sigma 56mm vs. Viltrox 56mm

I was curious how the two native Canon EF-M 56mm f/1.4 lenses compared. Is one better in image quality or features than the other? At least right now there is a significant price difference between the two. Check out the embedded video to see how it goes! 

Sigma and Viltrox 56mm lenses

Check out the YouTube video here:

Sigma 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Canon EF-M:
B&H: https://bhpho.to/3bNQUjk
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3cC8pUb
ebay: http://ebay.us/5Q3NxW
Used on KEH: https://shrsl.com/2b947

Viltrox 56mm f/1.4 AF lens for Canon EF-M:
Amazon: https://amzn.to/39sl5Pa
B&H: https://bhpho.to/3nXMoF0
ebay: http://ebay.us/b4IRWE

As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases! 

Here are the notes I wrote up while compiling data and deciding what I should mention in the video.

Physical properties of the lens:

  • The Sigma lens is shorter but thicker than the Viltrox.  
  • Weight is 280g for the Sigma and 290g for the Viltrox.
  • Sigma: 66.5mm x 59.5mm (W x L)
  • Viltrox: 65mm x 72mm
  • Both lenses have an aperture range of f/1.4 to f/16.
  • Both lenses have 9 aperture blades.
  • The Viltrox lens has an aperture ring. The only point in the ring that clicks is at f/16. The Sigma lens doesnā€™t have one. With native EF-M lenses I donā€™t think an aperture ring is necessary, but thatā€™s my personal preference.
  • Both lenses have quiet STM based focusing motors.
  • Both lenses include a hood. The Sigma lens has a 55mm filter thread whereas the Viltrox has a 52mm thread and it is mostly made out of metal..
  • The Viltrox lens has a completely metal casing. The Sigma lens appears to be a mixture of plastic, aluminum, and rubber.
  • I prefer the metal machined focus ring of the Viltrox lens compared to Sigmaā€™s rubber encased focus ring. Itā€™s just as easy to use and provides as much grip without having a component on the lens that will eventually degrade with age.
  • The Viltrox lens includes a built-in micro USB port for firmware updates. There have been multiple updates since the release of the lens. You need the UD-11 accessory dock to update the firmware of the Sigma lens. Currently there has been a single firmware update that added a feature to adjust the speed of the manual focus ring.

Minimum focusing distance:

  • Sigma: 50cm (19.7 inches)
  • Viltrox: 60cm (23.6 inches)
The Sigma gets closerā€¦

Focus breathing test:

  • From what I can tell the Viltrox lens has slightly less focus breathing than the Sigma lens. Of course this test is from extreme close distance to infinity focus. If you were using these lenses for video you probably wouldnā€™t notice it much.
The Viltrox lens has more chromatic aberrations throughout the aperture range (f/1.4 shown here even at 600px for this image it can been seen at 100%).

Image quality:

  • At normal viewing resolution on a computer, results from the two lenses look close enough. Differences donā€™t start showing up until around 50% on my 1080p screen. Of course, take any tests Iā€™ve done with a grain of salt. There could be slight variation in focal point among other variables.
  • In reality good luck noticing any large differences. Look at the f/2.8 portraits for example. Based on so many variables in a scene like that Iā€™d say the Viltrox image looks a bit better due to where it focused and how the light hit.
  • Detail 
    • Can look similar, but I think that the Sigma has the edge at larger apertures.
    • At high magnification of the image the Viltrox can appear more washed out looking.
    • In the studio test the Sigma keeps its lead in image detail at high magnification.
  • Background point source light quality
    • Viltrox is smoother and cleaner inside the circles in my studio test. Keep in mind itā€™s one test at a single focal distance.
    • Sigma has rounder circles. The edges show less color fringing.
  • Optical Aberrations
    • The Viltrox has more visible chromatic aberrations.
    • Bokeh quality (studio scene)
  • Portrait example
    • In a portrait situation the smoothness and color cast of the Viltrox gives the images a less clinical look compared to the Sigma. Other than that difference, they are both great options for photos of people. 
  • Minimum focus reproduction
    • The Sigma lens clearly gets closer.
  • Outdoor sample photos
    • I think the low aberrations of the Sigma makes it a good fit for outdoor nature photography.
  • Photos isolated on white
    • For my thumbnail images I often photograph a camera or lens and remove the background later on in post. For that use case Iā€™m often going with the Sigma lens due to itā€™s longer focal length than the Canon 32mm f/1.4 lens and itā€™s lower aberrations compared to the Viltrox lens. That makes it easier to cut the object out of the background with cleaner edges. 

The Sigmaā€™s aperture blades keep a rounder hole through the range.

Video Results:

  • 1080p, 60 fps, f/2.8, 1/125th and 1080p, 60/30 fps, f/1.4, 1/1000th
    • The two lenses appear to look extremely similar and focus decently well with the M50. Any inconsistency in focusing is shared which I think is more on the M50 than the lenses.
  • Sigma @ 4k, 24 fps, f/4, 1/50th, ISO 100
    • Again, not much of a difference between the two lenses which is a good thing. The poor focusing comes down to the M50 itself rather than the lenses.



  • Automatic video mode
    • Both lenses are all over the place when the camera is set to do automatic exposure mode. Before firmware v1.0.8 the Viltrox lenses had major issues with automatic video mode but they fixed the problem. The Viltrox lens was using v1.0.9 firmware for this video.

Conclusion:

  • Both lenses work fine on the M50 and M5. Iā€™ve only used these lenses with the Canon EOS M50 and M5. There is the possibility that they might perform differently on other EOS M bodies. 
  • The Viltrox lens was using v1.0.9 firmware for this video. The Sigma lens was updated to v1.0.1 but that shouldnā€™t be functionally different from v1.0 because it relates to a focus ring speed adjustment feature with no mention of other changes.
  • At the time of this video the Viltrox is around 54% less in price than the Sigma lens. Obviously prices can change quickly. The Sigma lens needs an add-on to update firmware.
  • Clearly the Viltrox lens is a better value, but think about features as well. Do you want a slightly closer minimum focusing distance of the Sigma? Do you want the silver look and metal build quality of the Viltrox? Do you want the highest image quality of the Sigma? Do you want the click-less electronic manual aperture ring on the Viltrox? 


Popular posts from this blog

Camera Gear Reviews and Marketing Issues Exposed

A great overview by Gerald Undone on his experiences in the field of camera gear related videos! It is an important topic. The more open the better, Iā€™d say. After over 13 years making photography and videography gear videos, Iā€™ve not had a huge amount of success comparatively, but Iā€™ve also never been especially brand safe to begin with for these companies to consider me. šŸ¤£ I think his mentions toward the end of the video are especially important. The unwritten pressure, or worse with companies like Insta360 , shouldnā€™t be acceptable and should be publicly called out more often. Thatā€™s probably the only way things will actually change for the better. I created a video detailing my opinion on the topic further: More of my comments on the videoā€¦ His YouTube channel. 4:30 I understand thatā€™s what Gerald does, but are there situations where companies are paying for flights and hotel costs of other reviewers with the expectation of a video/article being produced? (EDIT: Iā€™ve seen confirm...

Viltrox AF FE 28mm f/4.5 VCM ASPH ED Lens Overview

Viltrox asked me if I wanted to take a look at this unique compact autofocus full-frame prime lens with a focal length of 28mm and a fixed f/4.5 aperture for Sony E-mount cameras. Viltrox agreed to my standard collaboration terms before sending me the lens.    In the video I talk about features, how it works in practice, and show photos I had taken on a photo walk with the Sony a7S as well as the APS-C a6000. Viltrox is starting this off as an Indiegogo campaign. They told me that it will eventually be sold through normal retailers: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/viltrox-af-28mm-f4-5-fe-chips-size-ultra-thin-lens They said it will be $99 USD or 109 Euros with discounts during the crowdfunding period. Check out Indiegogo for details. I am not an affiliate of that website. You can check on the status of availability through my usual affiliates: B&H Photo Video Amazon As an affiliate of these shops, I earn from qualifying purchases!    The front of the lens. K...

First look at the Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 for Sony E-mount bought from KEH

I've use a Sony Alpha A6000 and the PZ 16ā€“50mm F/3.5ā€“5.6 OSS kit lens with my computer as a webcam for a long time now. It's a lower cost option that has been very consistent outputting 1080p at 30 FPS to a USB based HDMI capture device. The kit lens is generally fine, but it has a few quirks. The biggest issue is that throughout the zoom range the maximum aperture value is not fixed. This introduces technical challenges when I want to show detailed views of product or similar use cases. There are also other considerations I'll talk about later in this article. So I decided to buy the Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN | C lens in E-mount as a replacement.  Links in this article are a mix of paid and through my affiliates. I earn from each in different ways. One is a flat fee and the others I earn from qualifying purchases. Considering them for your purchasing needs helps make the creation of this information viable!   I made a video unboxing the lens and trying it out with Open ...